Home »
RDEK Galloway Lands bylaw amendments adopted
An impassioned plea by City of Fernie Mayor Nic Milligan to fellow Regional District of East Kootenay (RDEK) board directors to vote against the proposed Galloway Lands project fell on mostly deaf ears July 14.
The board voted nine to five in favour of adopting Bylaws No. 3213 and 3214, which amend the Elk Valley Official Community Plan and Elk Valley Zoning Bylaw to rezone multiple properties known as the Galloway Lands in Electoral Area A, permitting increased residential development on the properties adjacent to Fernie Alpine Resort and the City of Fernie.
Prior to the vote, Mayor Milligan asked fellow board members to reconsider their positions.
He referenced Sea-to-Sky Gondola manager and Tourism Squamish chair Kirby Brown who spoke in Fernie in the fall of 2022.
âHe warned the City of Fernie, and by extension this region, that the changes theyâve seen that is making development so difficult to live, work and settle in Squamish, is coming here. And itâs not just coming to Fernie. Itâs coming regionally, because it pushes people outward.
âAs I said last time, itâs happening in mountain towns across the continent. The people who support the local economy â the services workers, nurses, teachers can no longer afford to live in those towns and theyâre forced to commute and it pushes further and further out as property values increase,â Milligan stated.
âOne of the things Kirby Brown suggested that we do, that they do for the Sea-to-Sky, is work with the Indigenous communities. Use that model and donât just think about short-term economic gain; think about your children and your childrenâs children â the future of your community. This is going to change our region; this is the beginning of something thatâs going to change this region forever.
âIt will have an impact for generations. Itâs an important crossroads. Make your decisions here very seriously,â he urged, adding, âWe took it to a public hearing. I appreciate that as it is part of our democratic process. We need to do that; we need to hear people and then we absolutely, collectively ignore that feedback. We minimize the input. We said âonly those opposed come out.â Thatâs part of our process. If we donât want it, donât do it! Letâs get rid if that process. If weâre not going to listen to people, letâs stop doing that.
âJust at this meeting, we amended our strategic plan to maintain the rural character of our region. This doesnât do that. These are exclusive estate lots that weâre talking about. This is not in rural character. Weâre creating this cognitive dissonance. Weâre telling the people we represent weâre doing one thing and then weâre doing something completely different.
âLetâs not squander our rural context, letâs not squander our natural assets. Letâs focus on those things that make life living here good. And then weâll continue to draw visitors and people in a way that sustains our community and then maintains an authentic sense of place that we have built.
âYou canât use the same development model over and over again and expecting it to change. They just donât change; they move in one direction and once these things are gone they donât come back. If we change the character of this place, itâs not changing back. Itâs going to go in one direction.â
Electoral Area B Director Stan Doehle told the board he attended the public hearing âand the vast majority of people spoke against it and theyâre not just out there complaining. I knew over half of them and have full respect for those people and they give us the numbers that supports the communities donât want this and yet as a board we figure we know better; we donât. In all fairness, the way this regional district governs, that thatâs a big thing, itâs huge that we donât listen to the people. We might not like what people have to say but at the end of the day, the people are the ones who put us in here. So if we donât listen to the people, weâve got serious problems.â
Electoral Area A Director Thomas McDonald in turn urged the board to support passing the bylaws.
Regarding public hearings, he said, âI do think theyâre extremely important and it is important to understand that a public hearing is not a referendum, itâs one piece of the puzzle. Itâs important to have that venue and for people to know their voices matter. However, there are many factors that are taken into consideration when determining how we will vote on a matter.
âIn this case, I felt the current proposal provides a balance between the opportunity for development, access to the land for this generation and many to come and environmental protections, including many of the concerns raised by the public and that is why I voted in favour for this.â
Directors McDonald, Jane Walter (Electoral Area E), David Wilks (District of Sparwood), Susan Clovechok (Electoral Area F), Mark Doherty (Village of Canal Flats), Mike Gray (Village of Radium Hot Springs), Don McCormick (City of Kimberley), Roberta Schnider (Electoral Area G) and Rob Gay (Electoral Area C) voted in favour.
Directors Milligan, Doehle, Norma Blissett and Wayne Price (City of Cranbrook), and Al Miller (District of Invermere) were opposed.
District of Elkford Mayor Steve Fairbairn was absent.
âThis proposal was one that all of us as directors took a great deal of time to review and to consider. Most of our directors attended either one or both nights of the two-night public hearing and we are deeply appreciative of all those who contributed their input both informally over the past several months and formally through public hearing process. This was not an easy decision. Although there continue to be differing opinions, it speaks to the character of our Board that these discussions have remained respectful and professional,â stated RDEK Board Chair Rob Gay.
The bylaws received third reading in May and had been awaiting approval from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure before coming back to the RDEK Board for consideration and adoption on Friday.
The required development agreements have been finalized and the next step in the process will be for the developer to apply for subdivision to create the conservation / recreation parcel on the properties.
Ian Cobb/e-KNOW